About Me

Name:CRB
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

Public Expression of Religion Protection Act

I'm honestly trying to find out if this is a way to take unnecessary income away from the ACLU, etc., (to stop their feeding at the tax trough) or if there is something else going on here. The Left is, as always, complaining in Theocratic arguments.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Veterans' Memorials, Boy Scouts, Public Seals, and Other Public Expressions of Religion Protection Act of 2006'.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN LAWSUITS AGAINST STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS.
(a) Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights- Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended--
(1) by inserting `(a)' before the first sentence; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
`(b) The remedies with respect to a claim under this section are limited to injunctive and declaratory relief where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion, including, but not limited to, a violation resulting from--
`(1) a veterans' memorial's containing religious words or imagery;
`(2) a public building's containing religious words or imagery;
`(3) the presence of religious words or imagery in the official seals of the several States and the political subdivisions thereof; or
`(4) the chartering of Boy Scout units by components of States and political subdivisions, and the Boy Scouts' using public buildings of States and political subdivisions.'.
(b) Attorney's Fees- Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: `However, no fees shall be awarded under this subsection with respect to a claim described in subsection (b) of section nineteen hundred and seventy nine.'.

SEC. 3. LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN LAWSUITS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS.
(a) In General- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a court shall not award reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys to the prevailing party on a claim of injury consisting of the violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion brought against the United States or any agency or any official of the United States acting in his or her official capacity in any court having jurisdiction over such claim, and the remedies with respect to such a claim shall be limited to injunctive and declaratory relief.
(b) Definition- As used in this section, the term `a claim of injury consisting of the violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion' includes, but is not limited to, a claim of injury resulting from--
(1) a veterans' memorial's containing religious words or imagery;
(2) a Federal building's containing religious words or imagery;
(3) the presence of religious words or imagery in the official seal of the United States and in its currency and official Pledge; or
(4) the chartering of Boy Scout units by components of the Armed Forces of the United States and by other public entities, and the Boy Scouts' using Department of Defense and other public installations.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act and the amendments made by this Act take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply to any case that--
(1) is pending on such date of enactment; or
(2) is commenced on or after such date of enactment.

http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Goal of Democrats as Leftists in their own words

For those who wonder about the basic character of the Left, here's a suitable statement by Paul Tsongas when he ran for President in 1992. It will speak for itself.

Democrats

Democrats have always believed that their essential mission is social and economic justice. And so it is. Look for such advancements in the twentieth century and in almost ever yinstance a Democrat's hand has been at work. It is a noble tradition.

That tradition must never be abandoned.

Underlying that mission, however, has been a rarely acknowledged but enduring notion. Wealth would be created by others and after its creation we Democrats would intervene to preserve fairness by the
equitable redistribution of that wealth. During most of this century that may have been a logical battle plan. Not so any more. There is today one glaring truth. You cannot redistribute wealth that is never created. A party devoted to the purpose of carving up the economic pie should be alarmed by
the reality that the pie is shrinking. Witness the devastation being visited upon critical social programs by the shortfall in tax revenues in most states in the country.

(bold emphasis mine)
This is wholly consistent with Marx teaching
From each according to his ability, to teach according to his need

http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »