About Me

Name:CRB
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

This world is passing away

This world is passing away. What I think is happening is that the western world is passing away. For the past 200 years we've lost "center", the focus that was provided by the Christian world view but which is now democratically distributed.

It is difficult to dismiss the idea that institutionalized (I don't mean "organized") Christianity has failed. For more than a millennium Christianity took the sword and conquered instead of serving and ministering. The "Christian" sword was one of Islam's complaints about the "Christianity" of the day. And it was a valid criticism.

As we leave the personal autonomy of the Liberal age (because we are children of the Elightenment), what will replace it? More autonomy? I think not. Rather, and sadly, like Germany of the 1920s, the need for strong leadership will come into play. Whether that's a totalitarian individual or a strong central government with strict economic controls, who can say? But no matter what the case, the Liberal world is fading.


The strong leadership may come from within, as it did in early 20th c. Germany. It may come from the outside in the form of Islam's growth. Or it may be a newly- or to-be-developed mindset that the world adopts rather quickly.

Christian thinking will need to change rather quickly. We're hanging tightly to the freedoms provided by a Liberal society. But those will soon pass and we'll need to exist in another societal structure.

Christian behavior will need to adapt. Gone will be the freedom to have large facilities for corporate purposes. (By "corporate" I don't mean for-profit business, but rather "program-driven".) We'll need to replace the appearance of structure and formality with ministry with little or no centralized control. As a result, ministry will be just that, and program-driven paradigms will fade from existence.

Church structures will need to adjust. I fully expect that churches of all sorts will be taxed. Because of that we may see churches resort to a minor violent response in a futile attempt to revive the American Revolution.

What will the Western church in the late 21st c. be like? I expect it will be composed of two segments. One will be a large group willing to pay taxes and receive a license from the government, but compromising on its doctrine so as not to offend the powers that be. The other will be a small house church. I would choose the later and would work toward the ministries needed to fulfill that option.

http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Live in a Liberal World

We live in a Liberal world. By that I mean the western world since the Enlightenment; the world brought to us partly by a reaction to the rampant religious persecution of the preceding centuries and partly by a demand that all be proven. It's a world guided by a principle of Tolerance that we also know as Personal Liberty where we're generally free behave and live, to believe or not, to act or not, to succeed and fail, as we may individually choose.

Gone is "community". While remnants of it remain, individual autonomy and self-realization are now the keys to fulfillment.

Gone is "faith". Everything around is has been tested and proven to provide maximum efficiency and comfort. There's no need for faith when the need for it, the pain of life, has been removed.

Gone is "purpose". If there is nothing outside ourselves, no community, no God, no absolute reason, then we remain with little other than now.

The church exists in this Liberal world. We live and think and behave within the confines of this thinking. At the beginning of the Liberal period, the 19th c., the freedom meant the opportunity for missions. Into the 20th c. we took advantage of the opportunity for education, building Christian colleges around the world. Many of the opportunities afforded by Liberalism have been well-used.

But the last half of the 20th c. saw the church grab hold of marketing principles, politics, and retailing as the new methods of choice. Without Community we have little involvement in personal ministry, so it's done by proxy, through agencies that we can pay to do it for us. Without Faith we trust that the budget is adequate. Without Purpose we just listen to the pastor and let him lead, but we don't interact with leadership and get our hands into the Biblical basis for and methods of ministry. We don't want to get our hands dirty.

Can we escape our Liberal mindset? I don't know. We're entering a post-post-modern era with challenges for which we're ill-prepared. I think that it's because we have no idea where we are today, so consequently we have no idea where tomorrow will be.

What should we be doing? What the Bible says, of course: Persuading with the Gospel, teaching the whole of the Word and making it applicable to life, living by faith in a community of believers, and having an eternal purpose.


http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Interested in bioethics?

If you'd like to interact with an expert in the field, check out ...

Sarah Flashing, FlashPointFiles

She's been a guest on Moody radio and you may soon be hearing her on BBC.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ahmadinejad's Letter to the American People

Here is a peek in to the mind of a world leader. And a peek into the minds of some Americans who respond to it. Read the letter first, and peruse the comments on each site. Both are rather telling.

A couple of things stood out to me:

1. "For 60 years, the Zionist regime has driven millions of the inhabitants of Palestine out of their homes."
Given his earlier statements about wanting to topple Israel and about Jews in general, this is not really a surprise. But it is definitely to be noted for the record.

2. "God"? Sorry, but that's probably not an appropriate translation. How about "Allah"? Now, why would the translation be "God" for the American audience? It certainly hints of a disingenuous motive, especially with the quote at the end:
We should all heed the Divine Word of the Holy Qur'an:
"But those who repent, have faith and do good may receive Salvation. Your Lord, alone, creates and chooses as He will, and others have no part in His choice; Glorified is God and Exalted above any partners they ascribe to Him." (28:67-68)
(This is not at all to demean his faith. It is a criticism of the translators and a question about their motivations.)

http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
http://philosophyforchristians.blogspot.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »